Alex Wright


A note on the notes

November 28, 2005

For the book I'm writing, I have been wrangling a few hundred references to articles, books and assorted Web documents, along with piles of stray notes. Trying to get a handle on this bibliographic sprawl, I have finally come to the realization that I need something more suited to the task than Word. So for the last few months, I've been shopping around for note-taking and citation management software. I still haven't found what I'm looking for, but here are a few tools worth mentioning:

  • Endnote
    The gold standard for academic bibliographies, includes an integrated tool for searching and importing citations from library catalogs and other research databases. It is by all accounts a fantastic tool, but my predicament is not dire enough to warrant shelling out $300.

  • Refworks
    A lightweight, Web-based alternative to Endnote that lets you create a personal online database of citations, with a Word plug-in for importing and exporting references in standard formats. This would make a great solution in an on-campus setting or for collaborating with multiple authors, because users can access the same database from multiple locations. But as a stand-alone user, I'm more interested in a desktop client.

  • BookEnds
    Lightweight Mac software for creating a basic bibliographical database. Also includes a free companion app for searching the Library of Congress and other databases. The free version lets you create a database with up to 100 entries. It also lets you attach documents to your references, so it can do double-duty for keeping track of notes.

  • MyInfo
    Personal reference manager for Windows. I started using an earlier version of this tool about three years ago and found it useful but limited. The product seems to have come a long way since then, but I'm gravitating more towards the Mac these days.

  • DevonThink
    I looked into this after reading Steven Johnson's "Tool for thought" piece in the Times. It's a useful and intriguing piece of software for pulling together electronic documents and mining relationships between them through semantic analysis. I expect to keep using it, but alas it is no help for bibliographies. This seems like an obvious feature gap; if they were to add a basic citation export feature, they would have me in the bag.
So far, the winner is looking like a combination of BookEnds, DevonThink and Apple Spotlight, but noone has quite convinced me to shell out hard currency yet. The ideal tool would combine note-taking, citation management and search (ideally with DevonThink-style semantic analysis). That I would pay money for. In the meantime, I expect I will keep making do with scotch tape, bailing wire and shareware.

Tags: , refworks, , ,


File under: User Experience

_____________________
« when i was cool | Say it ain't so, Dr Hal »

 

Glut: Mastering Information Through the Ages

GLUT:
Mastering Information Through the Ages


“A penetrating and highly entertaining meditation on the information age and its historical roots.”
—Los Angeles Times     

“A fascinating tour of the many ways that humans have collected, organized and shared information.”
—Publisher's Weekly     

“A readable romp through the history of information processing, from the origins of writing to the emergence of libraries and finally the World Wide Web.”
—New Scientist     

Now Available From:

amazon.com Btn Powell